Finding the right photo editing PC is all about knowing how much you’re willing to spend and exactly what your needs are. The good news is that just about any computer can edit photos decently. However, if you’re looking for a nice machine, something that’s a pleasure to work on, what you’ll want is to consider just how much speed and quality you need. All of the computers on this list are great for basic photo tasks like adjusting brightness and contrast, and cropping. However, once you head into the realm of RAW photographs, large projects with 100s of stills, and huge image processing tasks, it would be ill-advised to get a PC that can merely “technically” do it. No one wants to spend hours waiting for photos to export.
In general, the most important factor for photo editing is the processor; Adobe Lightroom, for instance, solely uses the processor. Photoshop, fortunately, is able to take advantage of the graphics card. RAM is the factor hovering over both of these; Adobe recommends 8GB of RAM for both of these programs. And of course, the hard drive plays a role in the overall speed of the computer as well. It’s a lot to keep in mind, but our list is simple. Here are the top 10 best computers for photo editing from lowest to highest price.
Here's how the best video editing software stacks up. Of course, if you use a Mac, the excellent iMovie comes with it. For PC users. The best known among them is probably.
Keep an eye out for the Editor’s Choice. This is the PC that offers the most bang for one’s buck for photography editing tasks. Acer Aspire Desktop. Acer Processor / Passmark Speed i5-7400 // RAM 12GB DDR4 Graphics Card Integrated Hard Drive 2000GB, 7200RPM For those looking for a solid photo editing PC at a great price, this Acer desktop offers a ton of value at a low price. With a zippy i5 processor, 12GB of RAM, and a large hard disk drive (2TB at 7200RPM!), it is more than fast enough for processing RAW photos, large swaths of jpegs and more. Users love it for its capable outputs (it can easily handle multiple displays), and very low price; sure some want to build a custom machine, but you’re at $100 out of the gate just for Windows.
Due to the lack of a video card, however, this PC won’t be able to play modern games, but for older stuff that’s not too intensive it should be fine. Also note that since Photoshop relies on the processor not a graphics card, this has no effect on its performance. This isn’t the most powerful PC in the world, but at about $500, it gets the job done well and extremely affordably. Price: $479.99 Pros:. Powerful workstation for a low price. Hard drive has solid capacity for RAW photos and large JPEGs.
Great value for the price. Good starting point to build a PC; adding a graphics card will make it capable of gaming Cons:. RAM could be better.
SSD would make it a lot faster (but it can be upgraded) 2. Aspire E 15, 15.6″. Acer Processor / Passmark Speed i5-8250U // 7658 RAM 8GB Graphics Card MX150 Hard Drive 256GB SSD Weight 5.27lbs Display 15.6″, 1080P Extras Ethernet, DVD For those looking to edit photos on the go, this recently upgraded Aspire E 15 boasts a new, 8th gen Intel processor, solid RAM, and an acceptable graphics card. On top of this, it also has a 256GB SSD, which is decent storage for most photographers; though if you’re shooting 100s of RAW photographs, it’d be best to build a habit of working off an external drive.
This laptop also includes an ethernet port and DVD drive. It’s a great deal for overall value, but it is a bit on the heavy side, at 5.27lbs. Still, considering it has a full HD display and plenty of speed under the hood, it’s hard to call it anything but a bargain – just don’t go hiking with it. Price: $599 Pros:. Plenty of memory for most tasks. Fast SSD.
Processor offers huge improvement and great value. Up to 15 hours of battery life. Graphics card allows for playing modern games at low settings Cons:. Graphics card isn’t very capable. Tracking pad scroll direction cannot be changed 3.
Dell Inspiron 3000 Series. Dell Processor i3-6100U RAM 8GB DDR3 Hard Disk 500GB (5400RPM) Graphics Card Integrated Type All-in-one Display 23.8″ IPS, 1080p For those looking for an all-in-one solution, this Dell has a great price and acceptable specs. The RAM and processor are fast enough for basic photo-editing and with a 1080P IPS screen, one should be able to get a great idea of what their photographs look like.
![For For](/uploads/1/2/5/5/125562607/230622168.jpg)
That said, a minor issue here is this PC’s relatively slow hard drive. While 500GB is plenty of space, 5400RPM is slower than 7200RPM and much slower than an SSD.
For JPEG editing and simple stuff, this PC is fine. However, like the first computer on our list, this computer is not recommended as part of a RAW workflow or for use in large projects. Price: $559.99. Skytech Processor AMD FX-3400 3.8ghz RAM 8GB DDR3 Hard Disk 1TB HDD (7200 RPM) Graphics Card GTX 1050 (2GB VRAM) Type Tower While this PC has the aesthetics of a gaming PC, it has all of the fundamental hardware to make for a great editing PC as well. Boasting 8GB of RAM, a 1TB hard drive (that runs at a decent spend) and a solid video card, it has all of the necessary parts to make for a seamless and reasonably fast editing process.
That said, the processor could be better and if you’re a professional, it will likely be worth spending the money to get something faster. Still, for most users who are just editing dozens of RAW photos every so often, this PC will be fine. For those who will be editing massive projects frequently, the processor will be a sticking point that won’t be worth fighting against.For most people, it will get the job done easily and effectively, and with plenty of space left to store your photos.
Price: $641.37 Pros:. Fast boot time. Processor is decently fast.
Graphics card allows playing modern games at decent settings and editing 1080p video reasonably smoothly. Acceptable RAM.
One year warranty from manufacturer Cons:. Decent, but some may just want to spend mroe and get a far superior processor.
Case is a bit large 5. CyberPowerPC Xtreme VR. CyberPowerPC Processor i5-7400 at 3.0GHZ RAM 8GB DDR4 Hard Disk 120GB SSD with 1 terabyte HDD Graphics Card GTX 1060 (3GB) Type Full-sized desktop This PC is similar to the one above, but its processor is around 20% more powerful. It has decent RAM and offers a similar hard drive configuration, with a one terabyte data drive that’s always nice to have around. The biggest upgrade is the GTX 1060 (3GB) which allows it to play “VR” games, but relevant to the Photo Editor here, this PC just has more power. While Adobe Lightroom does not use a graphics card, Photoshop can. This helps overall performance.
Lightroom, unfortunately, solely uses a computer’s processor and thus will receive no benefit here. Still, for many, this is a great PC that offers a ton of value. That said, it is in an awkward place price-wise. At this point, one can get a lot more bang for their buck by spending just a few hundred more dollars. Still, if this is as much as you want to spend, this is a solid PC.
Price: $829.99. Dell Processor i7 7700HQ RAM 8GB DDR4 Hard Disk 128GB SSD + 1 TB HDD (5400 RPM) Graphics Card GTX 1050 Type Laptop Display 1080P, 15.6″ In another case of a “gaming” computer offering a lot of features useful for Photo Editors, this Inspiron is pretty sweet with some minor drawbacks. For one, its processor, is about 20% faster than the i5 above. On top of this, it also boasts an SSD and a data drive, but do note that the data drive is 5400RPM, a detectable decrease in speed. Still, with a GTX 1050, it has a solid amount of power for Photoshop, and will actually perform better with Lightroom, but the bottleneck could very well be the slow hard drive. Therefore, the performance is likely to be very comparable to the above PC.
However, if you’re looking for a laptop this isn’t much of a tradeoff. Plus, one can always edit their photos on the SSD and use the data drive strictly for storage. Price: $859.99. Vision Processor i7-7700 RAM 16GB DDR4 Hard Disk 512GB SSD Graphics Card Integrated Type Tower Now this is a beast of a PC, particularly for Lightroom users. The i7-7700 is a very fast processor. Plus, this PC has a great amount of RAM and a lightning fast SSD drive that’s big enough to hold a good amount of projects.
The biggest drawback to this computer is its lack of a graphics card. The good news is that it’s straightforward to upgrade it (graphics cards are plug and play devices), but it will take an extra couple of hundred bucks should you choose to add this. Still, this PC offers a ton of value and will work well with Photoshop and about as it gets with LIghtroom. It’s a great value if it fits your needs, or if it’s on the right track and you’re wanting to upgrade later. Price: $1049. Acer Processor i7 7700HQ RAM 16GB DDR4 Hard Disk 256GB SSD Graphics Card GTX 1060 6GB Type Laptop Display 1080p Now this is one beast of a laptop. Boasting a fast i7 processor, plenty of RAM, and a monstrous graphics card, the GTX 1060, this laptop only has one real issue: its rather small SSD.
The good news is, this is fairly straightforward to upgrade; one can either use an external hard drive or add an internal one. Another nice perk of this laptop and its robust graphics cards is that attaching a 4K monitor can be a nice at home setup with dual screens. This is a great laptop for basically all purposes. It will handle Photoshop and LIghtroom well. One minor note, however, the 7700HQ while a decent process, is about 30% slower than its similarly-named desktop brother, the i7-7700.
So don’t think this laptop is faster than the Vision PC above it. Price: $1049 (5 percent off MSRP). CyberpowerPC Processor Ryzen 1700X Processor // RAM 8GB DDR4 Hard Disk 1TB HDD Graphics Card RX 580 (4GB) Type Tower For those who follow the processor wars, the Ryzen is AMD’s new champion. This processor boasts amazing performance and at a great price. While some of Intel’s newest processors are starting to stack up (the ), the value is undeniable.
Check out Passmark’s chart showing that this processor is only matched by significantly less powerful processors (i3, c’mon!). The truth is that if you want a lot of bang, then the Ryzen is by far the best bang for one’s buck. This PC is therefore unreal for photo editing. Since Photoshop only uses the processor, one can maximize the incredible performance of the Ryzen. Plus, it has plenty of storage space with one terabyte, and a formidable graphics card, the RX 580, which means its capable of playing modern games at medium to high settings or editing video of any sort. This PC is the editor’s choice because out of the box, it will be great for large photography projects that need a lot of processor power. That’s simply not true anywhere down the line.
It’s also considerably future proof. This is a great PC at a great price and there’s not much it isn’t capable of. Price: $1029.99 Pros:. Amazingly fast processor has many cores and extremely high passmark score (almost 20% higher than i7 7700K. Attractive exterior. One year parts and labor warranty from manufacturer. Powerful enough for simple to advanced photography uses, video editing, and playing modern games Cons:.
Overkill for basic use. More RAM would be better. Apple Processor i5 RAM 8GB DDR4 Hard Disk 2TB HDD (7200 RPM), Fusion Graphics Card Radeon Pro 580 Type All-in-One As a PC reviewer, I own both Macs and PCs and I am willing to say: Macs tend to be worth it for certain things.
The iMac is a great machine to own if you can afford it. The best part about it is not the performance, in fact, for Photoshop and other programs, it’s not going to blow many of these PCs out of the water. In fact, it may even be slower.
That said, it will be very stable. So then, if this machine isn’t particularly fast, why is it on this list? Here’s why: the display is out of this world.
There is almost no equivalent display on the market. It’s so bright it hurts. The color is outstanding.
And it’s just a plain great looking machine. Some other general perks are that it has a good sized hard drive, and a good graphics card, meaning video editing will go great. The i5, however, is going to suffer when editing 4K video or huge RAW photo files; it will do the job, just don’t expect the fastest performance. Still, for those who are Mac-inclined, this is a great machine. If you’ve got a bit more to spend, you can ready my article,. One big aspect of this machine, however, is that it is toward the end of its lifecycle. We can expect a new iMac in the next 300 days or so.
If that bothers you, then you may want to wait. Price: $2149 (7 percent off MSRP) Pros:. Unparalled display makes editing well, anything, enjoyable. Solid graphics card. Fast processor. Can run modern games at medium settings (but less of a game selection than Windows).
Great for editing 4K video (Final Cut, Premiere Pro is doable, but not fantastic). Included keyboard has a great feel and look Cons:. RAM can be upgraded. Overkill for simple photo editing Heavy, Inc. Is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by linking to Amazon. Our product recommendations are guided solely by our editors. We have no relationship with manufacturers.
Determining your 4K editing needs, both now and in the near future may take some time, but it will ensure that you purchase an editing system than can handle all the projects you'll be working on, the type of footage you'll be editing and the length and complexity of the edits. To start editing 4K video, you’ll first need to ask yourself some questions about your projects. What type of footage will you be editing: R3D, CinemaDNG, ProRes, XAVC S, mp4? How complex are your projects: single shot, single camera, multi-camera, animation, VFX? What are your output formats? How long do you have to deliver your edits?
Finally, are you editing online or offline? Offline Editing, Nothing to Do With the Web Offline editing refers to editing a proxy of the original source footage; online editing is cutting the original material. If you don’t have to deliver right away then you can edit offline.
Offline editing can also be a good option if you’re only delivering in HD. See “Getting to Know Offline Editing” for more on this topic. Where offline editing takes more time and storage space, it allows you ease in editing your footage. It can help a less powerful system run more smoothly. If you’re working with minimal 4K footage and your final edit isn’t that long, like a short promo or a music video, offline editing may be a good option for you. Formats Matter Digital footage formats vary from camera to camera.
Recording format makes a huge difference in meeting what your editing system requires. If you’re editing footage from 4K cameras like a, JVC, or Sony, then the demands aren’t much more than that of low compression HD because the bitrates are similar.
However, if you’re working with footage from RED cameras, or Sony, the raw 4K files have much higher bitrates, requiring more storage and processing power. Editing raw 4K footage takes more horsepower and storage than compressed formats. Additionally, multi-camera edits, VFX, and tight deadlines typically require a much more powerful system. The Speed You Need We’ll break things down into two categories: offline editing — and limited online work — and online editing, meaning a good entry level for multiple 4K streams, VFX and color grading at or near real-time. These specs are good for both PC and Mac since there isn’t much difference in the hardware. Offline Editing: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Online Editing: Dual NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M Always check the compatibility of your editing software with your video card to ensure that GPU rendering and multiple GPUs are supported. A comparable, compatible AMD or NVIDIA GPU can be used.
![Mac Mac](https://cdn2.macworld.co.uk/cmsdata/features/3450093/mbp_2017_15photoshop.jpg)
The GeForce cards listed above are a baseline. While many GPUs have greater video rendering power than system CPUs and RAM, remember GPUs need enough power to drive your system display monitors in addition to rendering video. When monitoring in 4K, you can improve system performance by taking some of the workload off your GPU using a RED ROCKET card, Blackmagic Design’s. It’s important to note that with the developments of REDCINE-X PRO, you can now use GPU rendering instead of needing a Red Rocket card for accelerated transcoding of R3D footage. RAM – Memory Offline Editing: 8GB RAM. Online Editing: 32GB RAM RAM is relatively cheap so don’t skimp here. Remember, when you’re running RAM intensive programs like Adobe’s Photoshop or concurrently with your editing software, your RAM needs may increase.
Storage Offline Editing: dedicated 7200rpm hard drive or SSD for media Online Editing: dedicated 7200rpm hard drive or SSD for project files and a striped RAID array Your storage needs depend on how much source footage you expect to be working with. Generally, your media storage should be three to four times the size of the source footage of a project. For example, if you’re editing offline on a laptop, a 3TB USB 3.0 drive might be sufficient, but if you’re doing an online edit of a four-camera shoot in 4K raw, you might need a 12TB RAID. You want to ensure that any hard drive you use spins at 7200rpm or faster for a smooth data throughput. Additionally, by storing your media and project files on separate drives from your programs and operating system, you’ll see a boost in performance. Despite the recent hype about SSDs, not all SSDs are as fast as they claim to be. SSDs are a good replacement for boot drives and project drives, but not for raid array drives unless you need greater speed.
In the long run, the cost per GB of hard drives is a more affordable solution. SSDs are a good replacement for boot drives and project drives, but not for raid array drives unless you need greater speed. In the long run, the cost per GB of hard drives is a more affordable solution.
For online editing of 4K, you need a striped RAID array of three disks or more to ensure data speed. You’ll also need a hardware RAID controller as well. Beware of less expensive RAID controllers that are software based; these are slower and use your system CPU and RAM which hinders overall performance. Photo of server hard drive array Motherboard Whether you’re doing offline or online editing, you’ll want to look for a motherboard that supports all your current component needs while giving you space to expand. A good motherboard will have at least three to four PCIe x16 ports that can all be used at full speed for video cards, RAID cards and monitoring cards.
ASUS, GIGABYTE and Supermicro make quality motherboards. Remember, most laptop motherboards don’t support add-on cards.
Photo of girl with motherboard Audio Many on-board audio chipsets pick up noise from the motherboard, noise that can sometimes be heard when you move the mouse. Dedicated audio cards don’t always solve this problem; furthermore, they take up valuable space inside your computer. Instead, you can use an external sound card. For $100, you can get M-Audio’s M-Track which combines an external sound card and a two channel mixer with two XLR inputs.
So What’s All This Going to Cost You can purchase a properly equipped laptop to offline edit like the, HP or Apple 15-inch Retina Display for less than $3,500. Combine that with a or Thunderbolt hard drive that costs around $150 and you’re ready to edit offline. You could probably find a desktop solution for even less. For online editing, you’ll need a custom configured or custom built system that tends to range from about $8,000 and up. There are many companies offering custom Macs and PCs for editing. HP has partnered with RED on the RED Edition which has built in RED card readers.
Of course, if you’re a little hardware savvy, you can build your own system and save thousands. Your Software Makes a Difference Most editing software packages do not support all the codecs and file types used by 4K cameras. Likewise, they don’t all work well with all the video cards available. So it’s best to look at the system requirements for any post software you plan on running especially the recommended or certified video cards since these have been tested by the software company with the software. Keep in mind that often the hardware specs listed are a minimum to have the software function, unless you have a lot of patience and time to spare your going to want a bit more in system power. Right now and are the top editing solutions that have native support for CinemaDNG.
DiVinci Resolve also has native CinemaDNG support and continues to expand its editing capabilities. Has the best support for XAVC-S and XDCam footage. REDCODE (R3D) is supported natively by all the major editing software packages and has the major advantage in post of letting you choose a playback resolution.
For example you can cut 4K R3D at 1/4 resolution (1080) and have performance similar to editing offline in HD. This can save a lot of time and storage space. Lightworks and offer little in native codec support beyond R3D, although the fact that they due essentially automatically edit offline by transcoding most footage on import does insure a more stable editing environment.
Editing software updates are frequent and native support for camera files are usually a priority. Before you buy, check websites for updates to see what formats are supported. If you’re planning to edit 4K with 7, supports FrameFlex 4K, but note that you may not qualify for product support unless you work on an Avid certified system. This is something to keep in mind when considering system options. Don’t Forget the Monitoring If you’re building a new 4K editing system, it’s easy to get consumed with GPUs and storage needs and forget about monitoring solutions. While you can continue to use HD computer monitors for your editing interface, it’s important to use a 4K external video monitor to watch the footage as you edit, particularly if you’re mastering in 4K.
4K monitors are gradually becoming less expensive and for most editors, there are now some affordable solutions. Seiki Digital released its (3840×2160 resolution) which has a retail price of $599 and can be connected via HDMI. The SE39UY04’s color reproduction is subpar making it poor choice for color monitoring; however, you can pair it with a lower resolution monitor with good color reproduction for your color correction work.
Dell announced three 4K monitors that reproduce 100 percent of the sRGB color space making them a good option for color grading. The Dell UltraSharp 32 Ultra HD Monitor retails for a hefty $3,500, where the UltraSharp 24 Ultra HD Monitor is $1,400. The Dell UltraSharp 28 Ultra HD Monitor is expected to release sometime this year and retail for $700.
Protect Your Investment Even if you’re editing on a laptop, you can benefit from using an uninterrupted power supply with voltage monitoring and filtering. While your standard UPS only turns on when the power goes out, more advanced models include power filtering and under- and over-voltage protection. Low voltage can damage electronics just as easily as over voltage and is a common and costly problem.
Conclusion Determining your 4K editing needs, both now and in the near future may take some time, but it will ensure that you purchase an editing system than can handle all the projects you’ll be working on, the type of footage you’ll be editing and the length and complexity of the edits. Remember that minimum specs get minimum performance. Go above the minimums for optimal performance. SIDEBAR: Building Your Own 4K Editing System for About $4k Building your own editing system can be a little scary at first, but a DIY rig can save you thousands of dollars. If you need help, there are many tutorials and guides to computer construction online. Here is a list of parts with prices sourced from one online retailer, so it should be considered an average, knowing that with fluctuations in the market, you may find either greater or lesser prices. CPUs: Dual Xeon 2GHz six-core $819 CPU Cooler: CoolerMaster Hyper T4 (2) $60 Motherboard: $520 GPU: GIGABYTE 4GB (2) $600 RAM: Kingston 16GB DDR3 1600 ECC (2) $360 Storage: Boot Drive; $175 Project Drive; $89 Media Drive; (6) $720 Blu-ray Disc Drive: $90 Case: RPC-800 $90 OS: Windows 7 Pro 64-bit $140 Power Supply: $250 Cables and misc.
$50 Total: $3,963 You could save a little money if you don’t need an 18TB RAID and can use fewer drives; however, at minimum you would need three drives striped (RAID 0) to have fast enough media storage for 4K. In addition to your computer, you’ll need monitors, speakers, a UPS and any computer peripherals you don’t already own.
That could ultimately bring your cost up to approximately $6,500. To start off, you need to ask yourself some questions about your projects. What type of footage will you be editing: R3D, CinemaDNG, ProRes,?
How complex are your projects: single camera, multi-camera, animation, VFX? What are your output formats? How long do you have to deliver your edits? Finally, are you editing online or offline? vmads:segmentbreak:1 Odin Lindblom is an award-winning editor whose work includes film, commercials, and corporate video. Odin has been building his own editing systems for the past ten years. And images from Shutterstock. Your comments about avoiding AMD because of the lack of PCIe v 3.0 are completely ignorant!
You are using SSD's attached to the SOUTHBRIDGE SATA ports which are the limiting factor at 6 Gb/s. If you were using SSD's slotted directly into the PCIe slots on the board it would make a differnce but you are not! As such I do my editng with 2 Samsung SSD's and a 3TB 7200 Rpm HDD with a much cheaper system with great performance!
FX-8350 8 core CPU + 32GB 2000Mhz Ram + Radeon 7870LE 2GB (Radeons are known for better colour reproduction than Nvidia cards) On a Gigabyte 990 series Motherbaord and get comparable results and times to people with DEARER Intel setups! I have been building my own systems for 20 years now. Your argument is almost as silly as people who swear by APPLE! To me Apple lost all relevance when they switched away from the Power PC Processors. Why pay for for Apple when the same stuff is under the hood? If I wanted a Mac I would by a computer with no Operating system and install Linux (a free Operting system on which Mac OS is built) and put an Apple sticker on it andsave myself some serious cash! I edit 4k ProRes 4:2:2 files in Adobe Premiere Pro all the time.
My PC is nowhere neat the specs mentioned above, and I have experienced any slow-down's in performance. My PC: AMD FX 8150 OC'ed to 5.2GHz, 16GB DDR3 Ram, GTX 760 2GB Graphics Card. Everything else is standard, run-of-the-mill. As for the comment that MAC's are faster editing computers, this is just plan false. Apple uses Intel and other PC parts, such as NVidia graphics. The primary difference in modern-day MAC's vs.
PC's is the operating system. Honestly, for the price, I can custom-build a PC that is 2-3x faster than a MAC of the same price, if not less. My PC will edit 4k Prores, online, with no problem – and it cost me a grand total of $1,023 in 2012. If I would have put another grand into it, I could have had dual top of the line graphics and a Raid array.
I guess it all comes down to individual needs. For short films shot on a single 4k camera, you can spend about 1500 dollars, I spent 1600 on an Asus MD50, 16gb ram, 7200rpm, i7 4790, 2 TB HDD with 4k monitor and it previews and edits 4K like it's nothing, although with GH4 I hear the file sizes are a bit friendlier to the PC. Anyway I haven't tested Adobe premiere to the hilt, but I put together a 7 minute min film, downscaled from 4K to 1080p and it ran as smooth as silk, rendered in no time as well. I very much doubt it's necessary to spend 8000 dollars unless you are making an FX-heavy feature film. Please forgive me but I wanted to pontificate a littleor maybe its whine.LOL. I sort of have grown to hate this hardware aspect anymore.every few years trying to decide whether to tweak my current system or start new. I built a system in 2012 using an MSI 760GM-P23 (FX) AMD Series Motherboard, 16 gb of memory, AMD HDT45TWFGRBOX Phenom II X6 1045T Processor and 7200rpm drives, and a nVideo GeForce.
I was versed on what was what back then but when I look at specs now I find myself lostso I guess I need to spend more countless hours figuring out what is what in the realm of PC hardware. TiIl now I could edit regular HD just fine in CS5/6 including 5-6 cameras and I was perfectly happy till the concept of 4k entered my cranium Though lately I have started to have some stuttering in playback in Premiere and even with YT videos on the web.so I know I need some tweaking, tuning or fixing.so I think to myself, look into 4k editing. See, I had picked up a Sony PXW-X70 camera last december and recently upgraded to 4k to take advantage of the rebate sony was offering.
But since CS6 doesnt support 4k, I loaded Resolve just look at the test footage. System wont play it without bad stuttering. Ok, so more reason to look at upgrading right? Sure but now again comes the question of how much can/should I upgrade versus just building a whole new box.and if you upgrade mobo or processor, windows needs reloaded which means reloading everything else.which means buying into Adobe’s new cloud software lease if I want to edit 4k in Adobe.(catching my breath).I just want to edit. LOL Not sure if I should spend hours to tweak/upgrade what I have or countless hours and much more money to learn the new tech curve and spec out a new system.
I read the comments about the mac performance, etc, etc, etc. Well, actually I do have two Mac Pro cheesegrater, a full updated 1.1 (CPU to 8 cores, GPU 2GB, Mem, eSata Disk Array and SDD) and a 4.1 8 cores update with two SDD, eSata 4 disk array. Mem, GPU 4GB. So, the MP 1.1 works very well, ah I updated it to Maverick in the way to used the foWIN GPU with a hack that allow to boot 64bit, up to 2K and a little higher. The other one works well upto 6K The news is that if I used it as WIN machines, the performance as renders, decoding and FX are much faster than in OSX. I had read that its happens to a lots of people.
I just don’t used it as windows because the final users, editor, like the “clean” OSX interface.